The Congress Party’s strategy in the run-up to the 2024 Jammu & Kashmir Assembly elections has drawn significant criticism, with accusations of jeopardizing the region’s hard-won peace for electoral gains. The party’s renewed focus on Article 370 and Article 35A is seen as a risky move that could destabilize the fragile equilibrium in the region.
Kharge: Congress’s Controversial Strategy
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge’s recent statement highlighted the party’s intent to use a potential victory in Jammu & Kashmir as a springboard for asserting control over other parts of India. Critics argue that this reflects Congress’s historical “expansionist” mentality, reminiscent of its centralizing approach during its time in power, including the imposition of Emergency in 1975.
Kharge: Historical Context and Controversy
Congress’s reluctance to revoke Articles 370 and 35A, despite their promotion of separatism, demonstrates a broader strategy of using such provisions for political control. This strategy has parallels in the operations of the Waqf Board, accused of land grabbing under religious authority, mirroring Congress’s approach to consolidating power and resources.
Security Concerns and Historical Criticism
The Congress Party’s track record on national security, particularly in Jammu & Kashmir, has been widely criticized. The party’s alliance with the National Conference and its lenient stance on extremism during the UPA government are cited as contributing factors to the rise in terrorism in the region. Kharge’s comments, thus, raise concerns about the party’s commitment to national security.
The Broader Implications
As Congress continues to leverage the debate over Article 370 and Article 35A for electoral advantage, it raises serious questions about the party’s priorities. The ongoing political maneuvers underscore the need for a closer examination of how political strategies may impact national security and regional stability in Jammu & Kashmir.
