Dark Days of Emergency: On June 25, 1975, the Congress Party’s decision to impose a state of emergency shook the very pillars of Indian democracy, as noted by JP Nadda. This politically driven move aimed to trample over the Constitution created by Dr. Ambedkar, fundamentally altering the democratic fabric of the nation.
Suppression of Constitutional Values
JP Nadda highlighted that those who now claim to be protectors of Indian democracy left no effort to suppress voices raised in defense of constitutional values during the Emergency. The period saw a concerted effort to stifle dissent and maintain strict control over the nation’s political landscape.
Honoring the Sacrifices of Democracy’s Heroes
Reflecting on the sacrifices made by countless heroes, Nadda expressed pride in his party’s tradition of resisting the Emergency. These individuals bravely stood as preservers of democracy, fighting against oppressive measures and working tirelessly to protect civil liberties and democratic principles.
Historical Context of the Emergency
The Emergency in India, lasting from 1975 to 1977, was declared by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi under Article 352 of the Constitution due to “internal disturbances.” This period allowed the government to rule by decree, suspend elections, and curtail civil liberties. The controversial 21-month period saw mass arrests of political opponents, censorship of the press, and widespread human rights violations, including a forced sterilization campaign. The Emergency remains one of the most contentious episodes in India’s post-independence history.
